Do you think you have ESP


ESP history

ESP is most commonly called the "sixthThe early experiments faced several
sense." It is sensory information that ancriticisms. Two were automatically dismissed:
individual receives which comes beyond the(1) The statistics were unsound which was
ordinary five senses sight, hearing, smell,refuted by the president of the American
taste, and touch. It can provide theMathematical Association. (2) That ESP is
individual with information of the present,physical impossibility which begs the
past, and future; as it seems to originate inquestion.
a  second,  or  alternate  reality.
Several appropriate criticisms were accepted
History:by Rhine which he used to improve his
experiments. Examples are: (1) There may have
The term "ESP" was used in 1870 by Sirbeen sensory cues. An example of this is that
Richard Burton. A French researcher, Dr. Paulif a strong light shined on the back of the
Joire, in 1892 used the term ESP to describeESP cards, it might be possible to see the
the ability of person who had been hypnotizedsymbol through the back. Currently to avoid
or were in a trance state to externally sensethis possibility the target card is covered
things  without  using their ordinary senses.by an oblique shielding, or kept far from the
subject. (2) An experimenter that knows the
However, the phenomena of ESP activity hastarget might whisper it or otherwise give a
been indicated much earlier, some say even incue to the subject. Presently no one in
Biblical times. Although there is no clearcontact with the subject knows the target.
evidence as to the certainty of the phenomena(3) More hits might be recorded than actually
it has attracted the attention and enthusiasmoccurred.. Currently hits and responses are
of  many  throughout  the  centuries.recorded by machine or by someone not knowing
either.
In the 1920's a Munich ophthalmologist, Dr.
Rudolph Tischner, used ESP in describing theThree criticism remain: (1) The "file drawer"
"externalization of sensibility." Then in theeffect. Only favorable results are published.
1930s the American parapsychologist J. B.Larger experimental data like one in a
Rhine popularized the term to include psychicmillion make this unlikely. (2) Results are
phenomena similar to sensory functions. Rhineinconsistent and not repeatable. This can be
was among the first parapsychologists to testremedied statistically. (3) Charges of fraud.
ESP  phenomena  in  the  laboratory.Can be refuted by other reputable
investigators  obtaining  similar  results.
The first systematic study of ESP was
conducted in 1882, when the Society forThere was a finding which seemed puzzling
Psychical Research was founded n London. Theuntil better understood. While some label it
journals of this society Proceedings and"missing-ESP" it might be thought of as
Journal were published as well as otherreverse-ESP too. It is found among subject
publications in the United States and thewho dislike ESP. Even though the subjects
Netherlands. Soon other countries werewere consciously trying to achieve good
reporting  similar  findings.scores, they scored lower than chance. An
unconscious factor seemed to come into play
However, these first studies of ESP werehere. Experimenters have found they can
rarely experimental. The studies consisted ofpredict higher scores for some groups (for
mostly spontaneous incidents that wereexample, those who are interested and
located. Many of the individuals studied wererelaxed), and lower scores for other groups
self-claimed "sensitives" or psychics. Rarely(those who show fear, negativity, or
were they examined under anything resemblingboredom). The factor of missing-ESP indicates
laboratory conditions. The researcherswhy  ESP  data  is  unreliable.
conducting the examinations resembled
prosecuting lawyers. The subjects wereMore recently computer games are increasingly
bombarded with questions, those standing upbeing used to test ESP. The computer is
the  best  were  judged  creditable.programmed so that a random series determines
the targets, and the subjects attempt to
The  Rhine  experiments:outguess  the  computer.
The first card-guessing ESP experiments wereAnother factor that researchers and
conducted by Rhine at Duke University inexperimenters must watched for in ESP and all
1930. The cards consisted of five designs,psychical experiments is preconceived or
now called ESP symbols, a square, a circle, apreviously learned knowledge. This concerns
plus sign, a five pointed star, and a set ofany knowledge which might influence the
three wavy lines. The symbols were printedsubject's activity. For example, a person
singly, in black ink, on cards resemblingmight say she sensed her son would telephone
playing  cards.her on that certain day at that specific
time. If the son had previously called her in
In the classic Rhine experiments on ESP, thesuch a fashion, then her sensation must be
subject tries to guess or "call" the order ofsuspect for it might have been based upon
the five symbols when they are randomlyknowledge of her son's previous performance.
arranged in a deck of 25 ESP cards. TheA person might strongly feel that he would
likelihood of calling a card correctly byreceive an email message from a friend on a
chance is one in five. Therefore, it iscertain day, and he does; but, can this be
possible to calculate how often a particularconsidered a ESP phenomenon considering that
score is likely to occur by chance in a giventhis person had not head from the other
number of calls. It was Rhine'' argument thatperson for sometime and was expecting the
when his subjects made high scores that couldmessage. The point being made is that when
be expected by chance only once in a thousanddealing with psychic phenomena all factors
tries, or once in a million, they displayedmust be considered when examining the
"extrachance"  results,  or  ESP.performance.



1 A B C D E 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130